In a world increasingly dominated by multi-outlet companies
and ever widening distribution networks, the home authority
principle is more relevant now than ever. David Lock explains
how Lacors is strengthening and improving its application
The home authority principle (HAP) has been recognised since the
1980s1 and has become a key element in the provision of co-ordinated
local authority trading standards and food enforcement services.
While the principle continues to be a success in helping to promote
consistency, there is room for improvement.
In June 2002, the Lacors (Local Authorities Co-ordinators of Regulatory
Services) management committee endorsed the creation of a home authority
"advisory panel" to discuss the application of the principle
from a strategic perspective and suggest what further steps may
be necessary to help support it. The advisory panel will consist
of leading representatives from industry, local and national government,
and consumer organisations, reflecting the range of stakeholders
involved.
WHAT IS THE HOME AUTHORITY PRINCIPLE?
The HAP is a vital mechanism for liaison and co-ordination between
local authorities dealing with businesses which: have outlets in
more than one local authority area; and/or distribute goods and
services beyond the boundaries of one local authority area. Essentially
the principle requires that every local authority should pay particular
attention to goods and services originating in its area which are
distributed/sold in different local authority areas. The operation
of the principle also depends on communication between all parties
involved.
An authority with a company head office/production centre in its
area should act as a focus for communication and liaison between
the company and other local authorities. An authority performing
this role is called the "home authority". A home authority
should establish contacts with the decision-making base of the company
so that company-wide issues and procedures can be discussed and
influenced. A home authority should be able to provide information
or advice on centrally managed company procedures when contacted
by other authorities dealing with local outlets of the same company
and/or the products/services provided. From the home authority's
point of view, this sort of liaison may highlight issues concerning
the effectiveness of the business' central procedures, which can
then be discussed with the appropriate contacts at the company head
office. Communication between a home authority and other authorities
should therefore encourage a better overall understanding of the
company and hence a more uniform and co-ordinated approach to enforcement
and any advice given to that company. For these reasons, authorities
should wherever possible seek advice from the home authority and
keep them informed if they have concerns regarding company-wide
policies and procedures. In this respect, liaison with the home
authority is particularly important before taking a decision to
pursue formal action.
Although the principle does not have any strict legal status, the
need to follow it is clearly highlighted by Lacors and key references
to the principle contained in various government codes of practice
and other advice to which authorities should have regard.2 While
the basic operation of the principle is inherently simple, the details
can seem confusing when all the possible communication arrangements
and complications are explained. The following key definitions,
figure 1 (below), and the explanatory notes (page 263) should help
to demystify the operation of the HAP.
KEY DEFINITIONS
- Home authority: an authority where the relevant decision making
base of an enterprise is located. This may be the place of the head
office, factory, service centre or place of importation. In decentralised
businesses the role and location of the home authority may require
discussion with other authorities taking into consideration the
views of the business. The HAP should also be followed when dealing
with enterprises in other areas that may not be, or may not be considered
to be, a business, but where the local authority is likely to have
a co-ordinating role. Examples include trade associations and charitable
organisations.
- Originating authority: an authority in whose area an enterprise
produces goods and services provided in or distributed to other
authority areas. The originating authority will have special responsibility
for ensuring that products or services produced, handled or provided,
within its area, conform to legal requirements. Where businesses
operate from a single base, one authority will act as both originating
and home authority. Port health authorities are considered to be
originating authorities for foods entering the UK from their respective
ports.
- Enforcing authority: all authorities are enforcing authorities
when inspecting, sampling or investigating goods or services, whether
this is on the initiative of that authority or in reaction to complaints
or referrals. Enforcement may be carried out at any point in the
distribution chain. For the principle to work satisfactorily, information
needs to flow between the parties involved in accordance with agreed
expectations. While Lacors suggests some home authority minimum
service levels in its home authority guidance document dated March
1997,3 it was felt that some further clarification would be helpful.
Two local Lacors secondees have now drawn up some basic standards
highlighting the areas that need to be addressed by all authorities.
SUGGESTED STANDARDS
Following consultation, these standards have been approved by the
Lacors management committee and made available to all local authorities.
It is hoped that this advice should help more towards commonly agreed
communication and service level expectations. The new standards
recognise that the HAP both allows and requires:
- co-ordination with some flexibility;
- avoidance of local authority duplication;
- commitment to a joined-up approach; and
- efficient communication.
A full copy of the suggested standards is available on the Lacors
website.4 The standards represent common sense points, which should
be taken into account by home, originating and enforcing authorities
when applying the principle. The standards are not onerous but highlight
the need for attention in key areas, for example: - raising the
profile of the principle with the elected members and ensuring democratic
support for the generality of the principle. Specific endorsement
for home authority partnerships with particular companies would
represent a good practice enhancement over and above the suggested
standard; - ensuring relevant staff are familiar with the principle
and have the necessary skills and training to deliver what is expected
of them; - the importance of communication between all parties involved,
including where necessary liaison between home and originating authorities;
- expectations on home authorities to check locally what companies
they may act as home authority for and to update relevant Lacors
website records and contacts accordingly; and - enforcing authorities
to ensure that requests for assistance from home authorities are
clear and reasonable and that due consideration is given to any
advice received.
ENHANCING THE STANDARDS
Enhancements over and above the suggested standards may include:
- home/originating authority participation in detailed audits or
management reviews of a business;
- production of written home authority agreements with particular
companies and, ideally, associated committee approval; and
- home authorities and originating authorities contribution to sector
groupings.
Sector groupings are groupings of home and originating authorities
that deal with a particular type of business. Lacors is seeking
to encourage and where possible facilitate this type of networking,
which can provide a useful forum for home and originating authorities
to share similar problems and issues and achieve a broadly consistent
line. The advantages of this include greater confidence in decisions
made by home and originating authorities and hence the development
of trust among the enforcement community generally in home authority
decision making.
MANAGING THE COMMITMENT
A frequently levelled criticism of the principle is that home authorities
with many head offices in their areas simply do not have the resources
to deliver home authority services. There are several aspects here
that need to be examined carefully.
Lacors suggests that it should be possible for home authorities
to offer at least a basic service (without enhancements). It is
however, recognised that it may sometimes be difficult for authorities
to argue for resources to carry out home authority work. In this
context it is hoped that the lead provided by the Lacors home authority
principle advisory panel will help elected members see the need
to support the principle in terms of the overall service provided
by local authorities nationally. In exceptional circumstances where
it is difficult for a home authority to even provide a minimum level
of service and another authority wishes to take on the role of home
authority, Lacors suggests that the flexibility of the principle
should be used to allow this - provided that all parties including
the company are in agreement. In this context an alternative authority
might be an existing originating authority or another authority
with company offices in their area.
It is recognised that in exceptional cases a company may not acknowledge
a link to a home authority, and enforcing authorities may need to
contact the company head office directly. While the work of the
home authority in these circumstances will be limited, it may still
have an important role in collating information from enforcing authorities.
A home authority performing this role should be kept informed of
any key issues to allow it to establish any trends in relation to
enforcing authority activity. The suggested standards outlined in
this article should help clarify that providing a home authority
service need not be an open ended and overburdening commitment.
While the establishment of written agreements with businesses is
listed as an optional enhancement, Lacors would comment that the
process of discussing and agreeing such documents should help to
determine the level of service which can be offered by the home
authority. Furthermore, the associated clarification to enforcing
authorities may help avoid spiralling numbers of referrals resulting
from misunderstandings among enforcing authorities about what can
and cannot be dealt with by a particular home authority. For example,
the home authority might provide advice that for specified routine
matters enforcing authorities may contact an originating authority
or the company head office directly.
Guidance might also be provided for situations where enforcing
authority enquiries would be redirected to another home authority.
This might happen where a particular retailer sells a range of different
products made by other companies, or where a large conglomerate
(perhaps as a result of company takeovers) consists of a number
of linked but still independent companies each retaining a separate
relationship with a different home authority. Any detailed communication
arrangements suggested by a home authority should state under what
circumstances enforcing authorities need to involve/notify that
home authority; normally this should only be when the issue is clearly
one relating to company-wide standard policies, procedures or products.
Such clarification might be posted on the Lacors website together
with other items that may help to streamline home authority/enforcing
authority communication and hence save time and resources, for example
the answers to frequently asked questions.
LACORS WEBSITE
It is becoming increasingly clear that the home authority database
on the local authority password restricted Lacors website has a
major role in facilitating local authority communication and providing
a central reference point for authorities. The database currently
contains over 15,000 company records and is searchable by company
and/or local authority. As part of its promotion of the principle
during 2002 Lacors will be raising authorities' awareness of this
important website database.
Keeping the information up to date is of course important; the
website facilitates this by allowing individual authorities to change
their own home authority records and add relevant notes. Home authorities
should therefore be playing their part by updating their own contact
details and adding/deleting company information as and when necessary.
Recent enhancements now also allow home authorities to add their
own word document downloads linked to particular companies on the
database. These downloads might include:
- agreements with companies;
- guidance on the circumstances when the home authority should be
contacted;
- target response times;
- particular company details (with the agreement of the company
in question);
- information on recent audits and inspections; and
- answers to frequently asked questions.
The interactive nature of the website however does not just affect
home authorities; enforcing authorities can (and are encouraged
to) use a new online standard form for making initial referrals.
This may go some way towards standardising and providing consistency
in enforcing authority requests to home authorities. In the explanatory
notes for the use of this form, an extract of the Lacors home authority
guidelines March 1997 is included: "Contacting/liaison with
the home authority is a critical local authority co-ordination mechanism;
however it should be noted that an enforcing authority seeking the
assistance of a home or originating authority should do so in specific
terms preferably in writing. The enforcing authority should avoid
open ended questions and should not expect an opinion on whether
the business has a diligence defence in respect of a particular
incident."
While the form is intended to be used by e-mail, it may also be
printed out and sent as a hard copy (for example where photos/samples
etc need to be enclosed). Clearly it would never completely replace
the need for telephone calls, for example, to clarify a particular
issue, however it should help to streamline the communication process
between enforcing authorities and home authorities at the initial
enquiry stage. Some home authority officers have pointed out that
the use of the standard form by e-mail will allow them to make use
of the subject title to automatically sort and collate enquiries
in their inbox on receipt. Although the HAP appears to be increasingly
important as a key local authority co-ordination mechanism, it needs
to evolve to reflect changes in communication and the expectations
of businesses. Home authorities, originating authorities and enforcing
authorities all have a collective responsibility on behalf of local
government for ensuring that the principle operates effectively.
EXPLANATORY NOTES
The focus of the principle is normally on businesses operating
in more than one local authority area. However, the underlying
objectives and functioning of the principle applies equally
to businesses with only one operational base if the goods/services
produced are distributed beyond the local authority area concerned.
For those distance-selling businesses (including internet,
phone, post and catalogue) having an identifiable decision-making
base within the UK, the local authority for that location
will normally act as the home authority for that business.
While the principle would apply to internet companies based
in the UK and trading in either the UK or Europe, the application
of the principle to world-wide trade via the internet is being
discussed.
It should be noted that for European liaison on specified
food complaints and investigations Lacors is formally designated
as the "single liaison body".5 This helps to support
the HAP on a Europe-wide basis by facilitating the transfer
of information between UK authorities and other authorities
within the European Union. Home authorities dealing with trading
standards matters may provide an important communication link
between consumers on a national basis and their home authority
company through involvement in their consumer support network.
David Lock is policy officer at Lacors, which was known as Lacots
(Local Authorities Co-ordinating Body on Food and Trading Standards)
until 8 April 2002. Lacors is holding a session at the CIEH conference
in Harrogate entitled: "Making the connections - regulation
and the wellbeing agenda". Lacors staff will also be on hand
to answer any questions at stand 49.
References
1 In 1976, the Methven Report [Cmmd.6628] advocated the creation
of local authority enforcement coordination machinery. Lacots was
established in 1978 and officially launched the home authority principle
in 1982 for trading standards matters. The principle was extended
to food safety in 1993.
2 Food safety Act section 40 Codes of Practice; Food Standards
Agency framework agreement; DTI National Performance Framework for
Trading Standards Services.
3 Guidelines for home authorities - detailed guidance for authorities
acting as a home authority LACORS 1997 - available to local authorities
on Lacors website at www.lacors.gov.uk
4 LACORS home authority principle standards - available on the
Lacors website at www.lacors.gov.uk
5 Food Standards Agency Code of Practice 20 sets out the arrangements
and further detail is provided by Lacors guidance entitled European
Liaison March 1997 - available to local authorities on Lacors website
at www.lacors.gov.uk