|
In the run up to the November firework season, the debate around
the menace of fireworks misuse inevitably grows stronger. In the
past, the use of fireworks was undoubtedly restricted to bonfire
night on 5 November. It is a very different story today, with the
use of fireworks for concerts, outdoor events, religious festivals,
weddings and birthday parties becoming ever more common.
Prior to the extended use of fireworks "year round",
the main concerns revolved around health and safety issues. However,
with an increased use of fireworks during the summer months, and
the growing tendency for fireworks to be used to entertain adults
and not families, events now take place more frequently and often
extend until the early hours of the morning.
Environmental and health impacts
The environmental and health impacts of fireworks are fairly diverse.
With regard to safety, if fireworks are misused or mishandled during
sale and use, the potential for accidents and injury is high. The
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) collects statistics on the
numbers and types of injuries caused by fireworks annually, however
this only covers a four week period during the "bonfire night
season" – beginning three weeks prior to 5 November and
ending one week later.
In 2002, the majority of accidents in England, Scotland and Wales,
occurred at a family or private party (363) with the second highest
occurrence in the street or other public place (295).
As air, soil and water pollution from the deposition of fireworks
is generally accepted to be negligible, with the risk of damage
to health from these sources held to be minimal, the issue of noise
pollution is fast becoming a key public concern.
The National Society for Clean Air and Environmental Protection’s
(NSCA) 2003 noise survey categorises fireworks as a specific source
of complaint. Out of 112 respondents, only one local authority stated
that "in its opinion" noise from fireworks was a major
source of complaint, while 55 respondents stated that fireworks
noise contributed the least number of complaints during the period
April 2002 to March 2003.1
Despite the lack of credible data to show to what extent noise
from fireworks is a real public concern and to what extent complaints
to local authority environmental health departments have been growing
over the years, the issue has been rapidly pushed up the Government’s
agenda with the progression of the private member’s bill on
the control of fireworks through parliament.
Primary legislation
The Fireworks Bill, which was introduced in the House of Commons
by Labour MP Bill Tynan on 11 December 2002, enables the Secretary
of State to make "fireworks regulations" to regulate the
supply and use of fireworks and reduce noise, nuisance and injuries.
Such regulations could include provisions to prohibit the use of
fireworks during anti-social hours, make certain types of fireworks
illegal, introduce a licensing system for retailers, restrict the
year-round sale of fireworks, and impose stricter rules on the training
of those who undertake professional displays.
On 18 September, the bill received royal assent and the enabling
act will allow the Government to:
- impose a noise limit of 120 db on fireworks available to the
public;
- ban the use of fireworks during anti-social hours;
- license people who sell fireworks;
- allow local authorities to refuse and revoke licenses if retailers
act inappropriately; and
- create a compulsory training course for operators of public
fireworks displays.
Until now, the primary legislation involved in the supply, sale
and use of fireworks included the Fireworks (Safety) Regulations
1997, which makes provisions relating to the safety of fireworks
and is generally enforced by trading standards officers, and the
safety standard BS 7114, which is intended to regulate the supply
of fireworks to the public and professional users by classifying
fireworks into categories based on intended use.
Purchase and use of fireworks also falls under the Explosives Act
1875 (as amended) which makes it an offence to sell fireworks to
persons under the age of 18 years, throw or discharge a firework
in a street or public place, sell or expose fireworks for sale in
a street or public place, or to tamper with or alter fireworks.
All these offences carry either a maximum fine or imprisonment,
or both.
Gerry Sutcliffe, Consumer Affairs Minister has congratulated Bill
Tynan on his achievement in steering the bill through both the House
of Commons and the House of Lords. “These new powers will
make a real difference in cracking down on the excess noise and
nuisance that so often keep people awake at night.” Mr Sutcliffe
adds that “when used sensibly, fireworks can be a popular
form of family entertainment. But all too often noisy fireworks
used at anti-social hours can cause real disturbance in local communities.”
While any new laws will not apply this year, Mr Sutcliffe has urged
retailers and consumers to “act in the spirit of the new law”
to allow for “fun without misery”.
Voluntary code
In addition to the legislative provisions, the industry itself
has a voluntary code of practice to promote the safer use of fireworks.
However, speaking at this year’s annual NSCA noise seminar,
Dr Tom Smith, of the British Pyrotechnists Association and the Explosives
Industry Group, admitted that with regard to the noise issue, silent
fireworks are an "impossibility".
Dr Smith said: "The industry is not averse to stricter controls,
indeed it has led in trying to persuade the Government to regulate
and enforce where this is appropriate. However, an outright ban
would be neither practical or enforceable and would deny some 20
million UK citizens the pleasure they derive from fireworks at garden
and organised displays." There is little evidence to suggest
that individual fireworks have got louder, but the industry does
accept that the increased use of "combination fireworks"
that produce multiple noise effects could be contributing the perception
of increased noise nuisance.
In an effort to try and combat at least some of the noise issues,
a voluntary ban on the sale of “airbombs” to the public
came into force on 1 January this year.
Enforcement issues
But noise in the form of loud "bangs" "whistles"
and "crackers" is a fundamental characteristic of many
fireworks and the British legislation and standard currently in
place do little to limit or control maximum noise levels produced.
While the Fireworks Act enables the Government to impose a noise
limit of 120 dB on fireworks available to the public, there are
real concerns that there is little in practice that local authorities
can actually do with regard to noise nuisance from fireworks –
even though under certain circumstances it is an offence to cause
a disturbance with fireworks and officers can enforce this using
the Noise Act 1996 and the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
Over three years ago, the CIEH’s then-environmental protection
committee considered its own position on noise from fireworks and
little seems to have altered since then. In its report, the committee
noted that "the relationship between the power of a firework
and the noise emitted when it ‘goes off’ is not a simple
one". Noting that the domestic use of fireworks presents local
authorities with complex issues such as unpredictability and illicit
use of powerful fireworks, the committee pointed out the tendency
for "displays" to be over before local authorities can
actively respond to complaints.
As Andrew Griffiths, CIEH principal policy officer, says, "the
major issue is response times. Even if there is a noise patrol available,
few events last long enough for a patrol to reach them before it,
and any evidence needed, are over." Another issue is proving
"beyond all reasonable doubt" that any one person or event
is actually causing the nuisance as there may be scores of fireworks
events within the locality. “Even where an officer could feasibly
serve notice in advance, you still have to witness it," Mr
Griffiths points out. "Besides, do we really want to be seen
as ‘killjoys’?"
At the end of the day, even with the new Fireworks Act, which aims
to have regulations in place in time for the 2004 fireworks season,
and the impending European Standard, how does a local authority
define an "excessively noisy" firework or display? And
at what level does a firework create an offence or nuisance? Does
it come back to the "education versus enforcement" argument?
Perhaps local authorities will only start to get the message about
responsible use of fireworks out to the public through local initiatives
such as the promotion of fireworks safety campaigns that address
the issue of noise and time and duration of use alongside safety
issues.
References
- NSCA (2003) Noise survey, available by e-mail from mstevens@nsca.org
- Quiet please: Loud fireworks frighten animals can be downloaded
free of charge from the RSPCA website: www.rspca.org.uk.
For further information on the RSPCA campaign contact Joceline
Tran, senior local government adviser, RSPCA by e-mail: jtran@rspca.org.uk
or tel: 0870 7540 166.
Copies of the Fireworks Act can be downloaded from the web: http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/20030022.htm
|