 |
 |
|
EHJ June 2002
Ten prime ministers and twelve general elections ago,
the United Kingdom was a sombre place. Butter and meat were
still rationed and Allied forces were fighting in Korea. The
cold war was getting chillier - the newspapers were full of
stories of atom and hydrogen bomb tests. Winters in big cities
brought dense, sulphurous smogs killing thousands of people
and the conurbations were scarred by gaping bomb sites.
|
 |
At least the Festival of Britain, which was held on London's South
Bank in 1951, had pointed to a brighter future, with its clean new
buildings and its needle-like icon, the skylon. And the pageantry
of the coronation, held in Westminster Abbey in June 1953 - the
first to be televised - must also have lifted the mood of the nation.
Fifty years ago, local authorities were far more powerful and autonomous
than they are today. Run by clerks and town clerks, they employed
architects and ran substantial building programmes. With their baths,
libraries, parks and cemeteries, they were well-regarded local parliaments,
touching every aspect of people's lives-welfare, leisure and public
health.
In 1952, sanitary inspectors, the forerunners of today's EHOs,
worked under the general direction of medical officers of health.
And in many other ways their role pointed back directly to the 1848
Public Health Act, which had established their predecessors, inspectors
of nuisances.
In 1952, a typical public health department was concerned with
controlling infectious diseases, inspecting food and hygiene in
shops and restaurants, ensuring cleanliness in factories without
powered equipment, checking drains, disinfecting bedding and household
items, destroying pests, maintaining standards in abattoirs and
dairies and many other duties, including dealing with unfitness
in housing and, a significant problem, overcrowding.
Officers had legal powers to seize and condemn unfit food, to prevent
nuisances and to remedy unhealthy housing. Their departments made
detailed annual reports, providing a revealing snapshot of the health
of their localities. These make fascinating reading today.
The creation of social services departments in 1970 gave councils
a new focus - empowering the poor rather than replacing slums and
killing bed bugs. The local government re-organisation of 1974 further
diluted their public health function. The number of councils was
hugely reduced and responsibilities were split, often confusingly,
between counties and districts.
Since the 1970s, the functions of local government have been increasingly
replaced by government agencies and quangos. Councils have less
spending power and, despite New Labour's modernising crusade, fewer
and fewer people seem interested in local elections. But, at the
same time, environmental health has broadened into a sophisticated
and multi-faceted profession, crossing all sectors and taking on
wider, often global concerns - such as sustainability and the new
public health agenda.
An
editorial from The Sanitarian of June 1952 is strangely prescient.
It is concerned with recruitment difficulties and the appropriateness
of sanitary inspectors to deal with new environmental hazards and
civil defence. But the practical, multi-skilled nature of the profession
seems curiously unappreciated by the powers that be. How little
things have changed. With a few alterations, much of the editorial
could have been published in June 2002.
Will Hatchett, editor
Environmental Health News
|