Sue Blakeley looks at the Government's stand against
anti-social behaviour as part of the crime and grime agenda
In March 2003, the Home Office published the white paper Respect
and responsibility - taking a stand against anti-social behaviour
as a response to anti-social behaviour, including noisy neighbours,
drug dealing, begging, abandoned cars, littering and intimidation
by youths. The Government's long-term aim is to develop a society
where there is understanding that the rights we enjoy are based
in turn on the respect and responsibilities we have to other people
and to our community.
Respect and responsibility set out the Government's current approach
to tackling anti-social behaviours using: increased policing; the
creation of community support officers and neighbourhood wardens;
the creation of crime and disorder reduction partnerships; the use
of anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs); and fixed penalty notices
issued by the police for disorder offences.
The effects of anti-social behaviour are most visible when the
results of that behaviour ruin public places, including shopping
areas, town centres, streets and gardens. Where public places suffer
from neglect, there is inevitably an increase in graffiti, littering
and vandalism, which deters people from moving around a local area
free from the fear of crime. There are two elements to the Government's
drive to tackle anti-social behaviour in public places: enforcing
local standards and tackling the abuse of the environment that make
public places a focus for anti-social behaviour and crime; and tackling
intimidating and offensive behaviour. The enforcement of local standards
includes the following regulatory functions:
NOISE NUISANCE
The white paper considered that daytime noise enforcement was effective,
but that night time regulation was inadequate. A new power to issue
a £100 fixed penalty notice after the elapse of a 10-minute
warning period was proposed. Failure to pay the fixed penalty notice
would lead to seizure of the relevant sound equipment causing the
noise nuisance. Further enforcement action including injunctions,
evictions from tenancies and use of anti-social behaviour orders
(ASBOs) should be used for the worst cases.
Environmental health officers have a key part to play in the management,
protection and enhancement of public environments and the white
paper stated that: "They possess the relevant training experience
and technical skills to assess whether a noise or nuisance is 'actionable'
under the appropriate legislation. Consequently, where anti-social
behaviour involves a noise or nuisance element, environmental health
professionals are likely to have a pivotal role in its successful
resolution". Thus, the white paper proposed that EHOs be given
the powers to shut down establishments, with immediate effect, including
pubs and clubs, where closure is necessary to prevent nuisance by
noise that they create.
FIREWORKS
The white paper supported a private members bill that is currently
passing through Parliament that will review all the rules and regulations
governing fireworks and introduce a more effective regime. From
1 January 2003, the firework industry introduced a voluntary ban
on "air bombs" as these noisy fireworks have contributed
significantly to noise nuisance.
GRAFFITI AND LITTER
A new power has been created to make it an offence to sell spray
paints to young people aged under 18 years of age, and the police
have been given new powers under the Criminal Justice Bill to search
for items which they suspect may be intended for use in causing
criminal damage, such as spray paints. Local authorities are encouraged
to set up "hot lines" to respond to complaints quickly.
FLY-TIPPING
It proposed that local authorities be given the powers to investigate
fly-tipping and to stop, search and seize vehicles being used for
this purpose, so that they can deal with small-scale fly-tipping.
Previously, the Environment Agency (EA) held these powers. Following
amendment to the legislation, both agencies will be empowered.
ABANDONED VEHICLES
The Government has already taken steps to deal with abandoned vehicles
by:
reducing the notice period for removal from seven days to 24
hours;
electronically linking the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
(DVLA) to local councils to trace vehicle owners quickly;
placing responsibility on the registered keeper of a vehicle
to tax and licence a vehicle; and
giving some local authorities DVLA powers to clamp and remove
untaxed vehicles (eg Newham, Hastings, Wandsworth and Croydon).
LOCAL PROBLEM, LOCAL ACTION
The white paper set out the key elements of effective local action
as:
clear local leadership, through crime and disorder reduction
partnerships, to
identify local anti-social behaviour problems and to bring local
agencies together to tackle them;
clear local standard on types of anti-social behaviour that
will be not tolerated;
support for local people who come forward with information;
and
an understanding that the local authority, housing associations,
police and other agencies are accountable to local people for
the way in which anti-social behaviour is dealt with.
EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT
The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill, introduced in the House of Commons
in March (see page 198), will increase the use of fixed penalty
notices and enable local authorities to retain fines that are currently
forwarded to Government. Fixed penalty notices will regulate many
environmental crimes, including fly-posting and graffiti. It is
proposed to pilot the fixed penalty notice scheme for disorder offences
to 16 - 17-year-olds who will be made responsible for paying their
own fines. These fixed penalty notices are administered by the police.
The Government also continues to promote the use of ASBOs, civil
orders that exist to protect the public from behaviour which causes
harassment, alarm or distress. ASBOs can prohibit an offender from
a specific anti-social act or from entering a defined area for a
minimum of two years. Breach of an ASBO carries a maximum penalty
of five years in prison.
The Government recognises a need to increase recovery of fines
and proposes using the Courts Bill, currently before Parliament,
to:
provide a discount for prompt payment;
register fines with registry of judgements (this affects a person's
ability to gain credit);
order clamping of a vehicle;
authoritise bailiffs; and
order deduction from defaulters pay or benefits.
Such new and revised legislation presents new challenges to all
environmental health practitioners. The need to work with a range
of agencies to improve the local environment provides an exciting
opportunity for EHOs to deliver effective enforcement and to bring
about significant local improvement to local neighbourhoods. While
EHOs will not necessarily be the people enforcing environmental
crime legislation, they are likely to be leading on planned enforcement
action and providing expert technical direction.
Sue Blakeley is head of district services at Birmingham
City Council. The views expressed in this article are those of the
author, and not necessarily those of her employers.