An award-winning scheme based in Ealing, looks at the
opportunities for locating wind turbines in urban areas. Nick
Warburton reports
As Europe's windiest country1, the UK should be a regional leader
in wind-powered energy. And yet to date, less than 0.5 per cent
of the nation's energy needs are met through wind-generated projects.2
While in theory, the UK has enough off shore wind to meet at least
twice its current electricity requirements,1 the UK still lags behind
many of its European neighbours in exploiting wind power. Even the
Department of Trade and Industry's estimate that around 10 per cent
of the UK's electricity could be generated through wind energy by
2010 is still a dismally low figure.
Most objections to wind power are at a local level; critics claim
wind turbines are noisy and a visual intrusion on the landscape.
But even so, it could be argued that many of the problems relating
to siting turbines can be remedied through careful and sensitive
planning. Furthermore there is a growing awareness of the benefits
of wind-powered energy which, unlike gas and coal for instance,
can produce electricity without generating polluting by-products
such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide.
An innovative project by Ealing Council - "Urban wind power:
Maximising its potential" - has just become one of ten schemes
across England and Wales to win a National Grid Community 21 Award
for encouraging sustainable development in local communities. The
award-winning study is unique in that it encourages developers and
local authorities to examine the potential for wind power in urban
areas.
It is an interesting statistic that in the EU where 70 per cent
of the population lives in urban areas and buildings account for
40 per cent of overall energy demand, there are still virtually
no wind turbines in towns and cities where the majority of electricity
is consumed.3
Up to now, attention has focused almost exclusively on large-scale
wind farms in the rural environment or off shore, one reason being
that wind turbines need to be sited on high exposed land4 or in
coastal areas in order to capture good wind speeds and hence a more
economic generation of electricity. The other barriers to urban
projects, besides reduced wind speeds in urban areas, are safety
fears and planning restrictions.3Pete Guest, general manager at
the Eco Centre in south Wales also believes that the design of wind
turbines has played an important role in influencing public perception.
While the council acknowledges that urban wind power is unlikely
to generate a substantial proportion of energy requirements, one
key aim of the study is to raise people's awareness of renewable
energy issues. The council believes that this can be achieved more
quickly if the public are able to see renewable energy in action,
and wind power is arguably the most easily visible renewable energy
source.
As Michael Calderbank, sustainability co-ordinator at Ealing Council,
explains, the other key aim of the study is to develop a practical
methodology for determining where turbines could be sited. "We'll
be working with local partners, and using locations in the borough
as case studies, to develop a national guide on how to find out
whether an urban site is suitable for wind power," he says.
In doing so, the council will explore the opportunities for supporting
two local partnership initiatives along the A40, one of the busiest
roads in London with an average of over 130,000 vehicles per day.5
If the methodology shows that siting the turbines is feasible,
the results will be used, subject to positive results from further
community consultation, by the two initiatives. Both have already
expressed an interest in the use of wind power.
The first initiative involves a partnership between the Northolt
and Greenford Countryside Park Society, Ealing's Parks and Countryside
Service and the local community with the aim of developing a new
public ecological and recreation facility at Northala Fields. The
18.5 ha development would serve a dual purpose - it would provide
the local area with facilities that are currently unavailable elsewhere
in west London while the facilities' design is aimed at minimising
resource use.
As Mr Calderbank explains, the Northala Fields project (page 202)
would incorporate new landforms in the form of four conical mounds,
which would serve as a gateway marker and icon for the park. The
mounds would also form part of a visual, noise and pollution barrier
between the park and the A40. The partnership is actively considering
the siting of wind turbines on the mounds to raise awareness of
renewable energy and to provide electricity for the park. In the
second initiative, Ealing's Local Agenda 21 Energy and Built Environment
Group, working in partnership with Coston school in Greenford, have
identified an underused corner of the school's playing fields as
a potential site for a wind turbine. The partnership would plan
to use the turbine as a way of improving a number of the school's
facilities, most notably enhancing the lighting of the sports facilities.
The turbine would also serve an additional purpose by complimenting
other renewable energy initiatives such as a solar powered fountain
and the governors' plans for a new toilet block incorporating solar
panels for lighting and hot water.
The "Urban Wind Power" project will be managed by the
Local Agenda 21 team in partnership with energy consultants, the
Centre for Sustainable Energy. The borough is also interested in
working with other boroughs, which are thinking of looking at the
feasibility of locating wind turbines in urban areas.
The project is expected to cost a minimum of £8,000 of which
£5,000 will be provided for by the National Grid Award. A
large proportion of the project's cost will be taken up developing
the methodology, which will comprise a feasibility study, a record
of the costs, and the production of a good practice guide. The council
has also taken into account additional costs for setting up and
running a section of the LA21 website,6 which will be used to promote
the methodology and for disseminating a full report and summary
detailing the case study results.
In developing the methodology and case studies, the council will
need to assess a wide range of factors. These include an examination
of the site topography and identification of potential planning
issues; the measurement of actual wind speeds over a twelve-month
period at sites chosen to have the greatest potential; and an assessment
of any environmental impacts. The council also intends, through
local community consultation, to look at options for partial community
ownership of the scheme.
In addition to supporting the development of the two local initiatives,
the council's study has a number of longer-term aims:
to use the developed methodology and lessons learnt from the
case studies to determine where else wind turbines could be sited
within the borough;
support the council's commitment to best value services by promoting
sustainability and environmental protection and enhancement;
increase the local strategic partnership's awareness of climate
change issues and encourage the adoption of renewable energy targets
within Ealing's emerging community plan;
to contribute to the council's commitment to renewables as one
of the ways to reduce CO2 emissions by 30 per cent from 1990 levels
by 2005; and
help meet both London and the Government's national targets
for generating energy from renewable energy sources.
As Mr Calderbank explains, Ealing's project aims to change local
perceptions as well as those of other local authorities, developers
and the general public to the potential and benefits of renewable
energy including wind power in urban environments. Furthermore,
the case studies and methodology "will demonstrate the potential
of such local projects in tackling global problems such as climate
change and remind people of the need to act locally while thinking
globally." The council hopes that the project will encourage
and assist communities to develop other ideas for renewable energy
initiatives, for instance, helping to reduce fuel poverty in deprived
neighbourhood renewal areas.
While urban projects may not generate significant proportions of
the local community's energy needs, small-scale projects can still
play an important contributory role in promoting sustainability.
According to the DTI, a wind turbine will produce over 30 times
more energy than was used in its manufacture during its lifetime.1
Compared to coal and nuclear alternatives, wind power is arguably
more cost-effective. As part of a larger wind-powered industry,
the environmental and economic benefits clearly make it a viable
energy option over the long term. Involving the local community
will be key to the success of such projects and will demonstrate
how local action can go a long way to tackling global issues.