Military EHOs have a pivotal role in planning
health defence, but just how is environmental health integrated
and managed on operations? Major James Fletcher describes
how environmental health support is delivered throughout the
four phases of an operation - force preparation, force deployment,
conflict and post conflict
Operation TELIC (OP TELIC) is part of the US-led multi-national
coalition to eliminate weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in order
to achieve a stable and secure country. It represented the largest
deployment of regular and Territorial Army (TA) tri-service environmental
health personnel (figure 1) and without doubt, the environmental
health sections made an outstanding contribution to the overall
success of the mission. For the army environmental health cadre,
OP TELIC presented the opportunity to test and validate some of
the operational environmental health concepts that have been developed
in recent years, particularly, how best to deploy and use the environmental
health sections to support units, throughout the operational phases.
In many aspects, the deployment was unique and figure 2 outlines
the usual deployment of an armoured division with its three armoured
brigades, supported by two environmental health sections, each comprising
of one EHO, usually a captain, and seven environmental health technicians.
One section will deploy with the close support (CS) medical regiment,
providing first line environmental health support to brigade units,
and the other with the general support (GS) medical regiment responsible
for providing environmental health support to the rear echelons.
The sections are equipped with tentage, vehicles, communications
and a range of monitoring equipment from water test kits (biological
and chemical) for testing potential water sources for war gases
or chemical contaminants, to heat stress monitors. This enables
them to operate independently of the medical regiment, but under
the direction of the senior EHO at the divisional headquarters.
OP TELIC saw the division deploy with only one of its armoured
brigades, and two other very different types of brigade, the 16
Air Assault (AA) brigade and 3 Commando (Cdo) Brigade. Both these
brigades were used to operating independently, within their own
operational doctrine and with their own environmental health support
(figure 1). While this provided an additional two environmental
sections, the different modus operandi did initially cause difficulties
in integrating them in the overall divisional environmental health
effort.
Another unique fact was the speed of deployment. A force of 46,000
personnel, 28,000 of which were land forces, with equipment, was
deployed in just 11 weeks. The potential health issues of moving
such a large force from a temperate, barrack environment, to a hot,
austere desert environment, with no existing infrastructure are
phenomenal.
Phase 1: Force preparation
One of the functions of an EHO staff officer is to input environmental
health intelligence on potential environmental health threats, into
the general commanding officer's concept of operations (ie how the
mission is to be achieved). Medical intelligence includes intelligence
on:
endemic and epidemic diseases, public health standards and capabilities
and the quality and availability of health services;
environmental conditions;
foreign animal and plant diseases, especially those diseases
transmissible to humans;
health problems relating to the use of local food supplies;
and
hazard threats and risk rating industrial plants in the area
of operation.
During the medical planning cycle, the critical issues identified
included:
early entry health issues, particularly field sanitation, water
supplies, prevention of heat injuries;
environmental industrial hazard (EIH) threats from the Iraqi
petrochemical industry;
enemy prisoners of war; and
refugees.
Concurrently, logistic planning will also be being carried out
to evaluate threats that may inhibit support to combat forces, including
water, food supplies and sanitation. These functions - the gathering
of environmental health intelligence and the formulating of environmental
health force protection measures - represent the main environmental
health effort during phase 1.
From this intelligence gathering, health defence interventions
can be formed to ensure that as far as is reasonably practicable
soldiers are protected from the health threats posed by the theatre
of operation. For example, medical intelligence showed that there
was a malaria risk in southern Iraq between March and September.
This triggered a series of interventions ranging from the issue
of anti-malarial prophylaxis and the treatment of desert combats
with insect repellent, to the training of unit pest controllers
and the education of soldiers on biting insect counter-measures.
Medical intelligence combines the disciplines of public health
and occupational medicine and on deployments, the medical/environmental
health force protection cell will contain specialists in these disciplines.
This gives the cell a wide ranging capability and depth of expertise
to determine hazards, quantify risks and evaluate controls to inform
commanders to enable them to make decisions.
Phase 2: Deployment
Operations begin with the deployment of an organisation called
the Joint Force Logistic Component (JFLogC) which deploys with its
own EHO and is responsible for carrying out the enabling work required
to receive the fighting forces. Enabling work includes a wide range
of environmental health functions from building camp infrastructures
and initiating waste disposal contracts to setting up port (air
and sea) health inspection regimes. To support the JFLogC EHO, there
is also a separate environmental health section responsible for
the general area environmental health support of incoming units,
including the divisional environmental health sections.
Once the JFLogC has deployed, the division will deploy in stages
according to a desired order of arrival staff table (DOAST). This
ensures, at the basic level, that equipment arrives at the seaport
before troops arrive at the airport.
This poses the question of where on the DOAST to put the environmental
health sections. Should environmental health technicians (EHTs)
be surged in as quickly as possible, or should the deployment be
staged to meet emerging health threats, for example humanitarian
issues? Doctrine dictates that environmental health personnel are
surged in as early as possible and withdrawn as conditions mature.
With a potential major refugee crisis and a major environmental
health commitment to the regeneration of Iraqi infrastructure, there
was a real need for environmental health sections to deploy with
sufficient horsepower to enable them to carry out environmental
health functions at a high tempo, for the length of the tour.
Phase 3: Conflict
The operation itself was a classic example of manoeuvre warfare
- defeating rather than destroying the enemy - with the emphasis
on winning the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people to force regime
change. This set the theme for the whole tempo of the operation,
particularly the rapid transition from phase 3 conflict to phase
4 post-conflict humanitarian aid activities. In fact, at one stage,
there were a number of phases running concurrently, with conflict
at the front end of the battle space, peacekeeping in the middle
ie securing Iraqi medical facilities from looters and humanitarian
aid, such as supplying potable water and medicines to local communities,
at the rear end.
All military operations involve exposure to risks, both conventional
and unconventional. The unconventional includes hazards arising
from industrial chemical installations. The UK area of operation
is dominated by the Rumaila oilfield and includes numerous well
heads, gas oil separation plants (GOSPs), a refinery and petro-chemical
plant, storage facilities and above ground crude oil pipelines.
This was seen as the major EIH threat to British forces.
Release of toxic chemicals could be by accidental release, collateral
damage, and/or deliberate release. These risks will, in many cases,
be highly localised and the normal response will be hazard avoidance
based on the prior identification, through intelligence, of potential
sources of release. However, there will be occasions when the demands
of the operation make it impossible to entirely bypass such locations,
as in the mission of 16 (AA) Bde to secure the GOSPs, and it is
imperative that commanders are made aware of the risks during mission
planning.
EIH risks must be managed in line with operational imperatives
and the responsibility to generate advice on the potential impact
of EIH on operation phases falls to the EHO staff officer (Major
Fletcher). It is his function to carry out a form of risk assessment
to provide the planners with the information they require to make
decisions.
One of the mission parameters of OP TELIC was to take and secure
the southern oil facilities and by definition, to achieve the mission,
troops would come in contact with EIHs, particularly when clearing
installations and securing them from sabotage. Thus, first line
responsibility for determining whether an EIH actually existed,
or not, lay with advancing troops. On moving into a site, a unit
commander will carry out a tactical analysis of all threats to troops,
including unidentified chemicals and materials. If an EIH is suspected,
this will trigger a further assessment by the environmental health
section.
Ideally, sites would be assessed by environmental health sections
prior to occupation, but movement constraints close to the front
line make this impractical.
In summary, the principles of EIH management are:
intelligence or information gathering;
tier 1 risk assessments - these are "quick and dirty"
assessments to determine any immediate risks to troops, whether
they can be controlled and whether a tier 2 assessment is required;
control - this may include area evacuation and implementation
of exclusion zones; and
tier 2 assessments - in some cases, the tactical situation
may dictate that a certain site has to be manned by troops. If
the tier 1 assessment determines that there may be a residual
risk and that local area controls cannot reduce the risk to an
acceptable level, specialist support can be sought from the UK-based
environmental monitoring team (EMT).
Phase 4: Post conflict
Environmental health staff are ideally placed to begin providing
immediate humanitarian support in that period between the end of
hostilities and the area being safe enough for NGOs to operate in.
To deal with humanitarian issues, the divisional medical group
formed a medical consequence management team to carry out health
needs assessments of Iraqi medical infrastructures. The team included
a wide range of expertise ranging from a pharmacist to environmental
health. The assessments not only provided data for NGOs, and governmental
organisations such as DFID, but also provided a means to prioritise
civil-military co-operation (CIMIC) tasks. In this area, the environmental
health sections made a major impact by carrying out rapid structural
surveys of Iraqi medical facilities and engaging the appropriate
agency, military or civil, to carry out repairs.
In the main, the priority was to restore basic services, particularly
potable water and environmental health personnel were crucial in
co-ordinating the water delivery chain from point of production,
which was at times a Royal Engineer water treatment plant, to point
of delivery. Many of the medical facility water tanks required cleaning
and disinfecting, and this was achieved by employing local labour
as a means generating income for the local community.
Major James Fletcher is presently serving as SO2 Medical Intelligence
with HQ 1 (UK) Armoured Division in Herford, Germany.