Accessing safe, healthy and affordable food in areas of
social and economic deprivation is becoming a real problem
in parts of the UK.
Nargis Kayani looks at the relatively new phenomena of
'food deserts'
Residents of Stepney in the inner-city borough of Tower Hamlets,
East London, would probably agree wholeheartedly with the statement
from the Social Exclusion Unit opposite, and will almost certainly
have had first hand experience of the day-to-day problems of poverty,
social exclusion and inequality. While other nearby districts, such
as the Docklands, have prospered, high levels of social and economic
deprivation have blighted Stepney. Consequently, many local shops
have closed, creating an adverse impact on both the local environment
and quality of life. For these residents simply accessing healthy,
affordable food is fraught with difficulties.
Food poverty, which essentially deals with the ability of those
on low incomes to attain or consume an adequate quality or sufficient
quantity of food, is not a new concept. The concept of food or shopping
"deserts", however, is a relatively new phenomena and
has resulted, in part, from the trend for out-of-town shopping centres
and large inner-city superstores, often situated considerable distances
from residents.
For many years, the "victim blaming" approach has meant
that the poor have been considered responsible for their lack of
healthy lifestyles and diet. However, following the election of
a Labour government, there has been a marked change in political
opinion. Action plan strategies, such as those contained within
Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation and the strategy document from
the Social Exclusion Unit, signify the shift in emphasis towards
improving the governing factors impacting on food poverty and the
environment within which people live.(1) These reports, and more
importantly the ethos behind them, appear to herald a new era which
recognises that the problems of poverty deprivation, social exclusion
and inequality of health must be tackled through a holistic nationwide
approach.
Stepney's existing Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) programme,
along with European regeneration programmes such as Objective 2
and the East London and City Health Action Zone, has recognised
that regeneration initiatives, both locally and nationally, need
to address the problem of food poverty. This has resulted in support
for small-scale initiatives in the area, such as a food co-operative,
community gardens, a city farm and school breakfast clubs.
More recently, the SRB programme has sponsored food deserts research
in the form of a case study examining food access problems in Stepney.
The recognition of food access issues as a central component of
poverty, which needs to be tackled through neighbourhood renewal,
has yielded a serious and substantial commitment to help eradicate
food deserts in Stepney. As a direct result of proposals arising
from this research, the recently approved £56.6m initiative,
"Stepney New Deal for Communities (NDC)", has allocated
£250,000 for work on improving food access as part of its
Healthy Living Programme. It is expected that match funding from
European and other sources could double this.
Cynics may view the allocation of these resources as misdirected
and many environmental health departments would argue that the money
could be better spent on enforcement. However, these departments
must recognise that there is a wider context to the provision of
safe, healthy food, particularly in view of the BSE crisis, the
GM food debate, the Lanarkshire E. coli O157 outbreak and the creation
of the Food Standards Agency. It is worth noting that food poisoning
cases kill significantly fewer people annually than food-related
disease, such as coronary heart disease and colorectal cancers.
It is recognised that the emergence of food deserts in areas of
social and economic deprivation is a contributory factor to the
widening gap in health inequalities between the rich and poor.4
Indeed, East London and City Health Authority figures confirm that
East Londoners suffer poorer health on average than the rest of
the country (27 per cent), and have an average Standard Mortality
Ratio which is 38 per cent above the national average.
For diet-related diseases (closely associated with fruit and vegetable
consumption) the picture is similarly grim. Cardiovascular disease
is cited as the leading cause of preventable disease in those under
65, and diabetes rates are twice the national average.(2) The statistical
evidence is quite uncompromising and has, in past years, lead to
well-known national health education programme campaigns such as
the heartbeat award. Such campaigns, although quite worthwhile,
did little to tackle or even recognise the quite legitimate problems
of accessing healthy food for those on low incomes.
The practical problems experienced by those struggling to survive
on poverty level incomes are quite staggering. Research into food
deserts has shown that residents in Stepney have to travel an average
1,285m to reach the only two green grocers situated in their area.
This distance is more than two and a half times greater than the
500m distance (both to and from shops) that a report from the local
health authority on food access deems acceptable.(3)
Stepney is an area characterised by low car-ownership and benefit-dependent
residents, thus visiting the nearest supermarket and market can
be a struggle both physically and financially. For many, this means
using public transport to visit the nearest shop, which can be expensive,
physically difficult and time consuming.
There are further problems linked to the outlets themselves. The
pricing and packaging policies of the larger stores make simple
price comparisons almost impossible. The low-cost European stores
sell pre-packaged goods at fixed prices and cater for the bulk shopper.
Smaller, local shops usually have a limited selection of produce,
which is often poor quality, at higher cost.
There is little doubt that the solutions to the diverse problems
of accessing healthy, affordable food for those on low incomes in
areas of poverty and deprivation are both varied and complex. Raising
household income levels, whether by encouraging benefit take-up
campaigns or by assisting individuals to gain employment, undoubtedly
forms a central part of any strategy to improving financial barriers
to food access. However, for some individuals, the elimination of
physical barriers should be the priority. In some instances this
means that local food co-operatives are the solution, but they must
be run in an economically viable and sustainable way and serve all
sectors of the community. In other cases, where residents have expressed
a desire to be able to access existing shops, then sustainable community
transport initiatives have to be considered by local authorities
and local transport providers.
The potential for exciting and effective local partnerships with
EHOs is a real possibility but a concerted effort is needed at all
levels - from voluntary organisations, community groups, retailers,
health providers, academics, regeneration agencies, schools, youth
clubs, politicians, and the media. All these groups have a vital
role to play in ensuring that malnutrition and hunger, the scourges
of poverty often associated with poorer nations, are not allowed
to proliferate in our inner cities.
References
1. Department of Health (1999) "Saving Lives: Our Healthier
Nation", White Paper, 1999, HMSO.
2. East London & City Health Authority (ELCHA 1999) Health in
the East End - Annual Public Health Report 1999/2000, ELCHA, June,
1999.
3. Frize J (1999) Food Access in East London, ELCHA, September 1999.
4. Lang T & Caraher M (1998) Access to health foods part II.
"Food poverty and shopping deserts: what are the implications
for health promotion policy and practice?" Health Education
Journal 57 p.202-211, 1998.
5. Social Exclusion Unit (2000) National Strategy for Neighbourhood
Renewal: a framework for consultation. Report by the Social Exclusion
Unit, April 2000, Cabinet Office.
This paper is a summary document of the BSc (Hons) Environmental
Health thesis by Nargis Kayani, a copy of which is held at the University
of Greenwich Library. E-mail: nargis_kayani@hotmail.com
A report highlighting the main research findings from the thesis
is due to be published by Stepney SRB in December 2000. For copies
please contact Mark Adams, central Stepney SRB co-ordinator. Tel:
020 7364-4458.