Nick Warburton talks to a number of environmental health
practitioners that are actively working in the field of health
protection
A large number of medical and non-medical practitioners are tacitly
acknowledging that improving public health requires close co-operation
and co-ordination between NHS bodies, local authorities and the
voluntary sector. Yet, there are many barriers to joined-up public
health planning and action - financial, cultural and historical
- and overcoming these is essential if the dream of preventing disease,
improving health and reducing inequalities is to be fully realised.
In an attempt to facilitate some of these issues, the Local Government
Association, the NHS Confederation and the Faculty of Public Health
Medicine (now the Faculty of Public Health) staged a conference
last December examining the opportunities for public health improvements
through joined-up thinking. The arguments for joined-up public health
are compelling and these three authoritative organisations have
publicly recognised that "the most powerful determinants of
health and health inequalities lie outside the direct influences
of the health services, and are largely determined by the physical
and social environment".
In short, this means that environmental health practitioners from
a local government background have valuable knowledge and skills
to bring to the table. Even so, in the published post-conference
report, Prevention is better than cure, it is stressed that "much
work has to be done to build the structures at local level, which
will embed multi-sectoral public health in mainstream activity,
so that this continues even though staff changes occur or a funding
stream ends."1
Policy developments to support public health in the NHS and local
government have been underway for some time, most notably in the
creation of primary care trusts (PCTs) in England in April 2002.
PCTs are now seen as the main instrument of primary care delivery
from the NHS, and environmental health officers (EHOs) and their
local authorities have a unique opportunity to influence their work
and direction as long as they become involved and are prepared to
work together (EHJ, August 2002, page 236).
Yet as Peter Wright, CIEH trustee and public health manager at
Watford and Three Rivers PCT points out, EHOs have still not fully
"grasped the nettle" that this opportunity presents, and
are even in danger of losing out while other less qualified individuals
"fill the gap". He blames heads of services and chief
executives for putting too much effort into meeting performance
targets, with the result of being blinded to the wider public health
picture.
A passionate advocate of joined-up thinking and working, Mr Wright
is part of a relatively rare, yet rapidly growing, body of environmental
health practitioners that have applied their local authority experience
and knowledge to the emerging public health structures. In 2000,
he moved out of local government to take on the post of public health
partnership manager at West Herts Health Authority, where part of
his remit included liaison with local authorities to ensure they
were informed and given the opportunity to participate in the Health
Improvement Programme (EHJ August 2000, page 241).
Mr Wright sees the creation of PCTs and the opportunities that
they offer in improving the health of local residents as a welcomed
move, recognising them as an important step change from that of
health authorities, which he believes have little contact with,
or feeling for, the needs and desires of local users of the service.
PCTs, he claims, present a massive opportunity for the profession,
not just in terms of working in partnership with the local authority
but also for individual EHOs who may wish to consider training to
become a public health specialist.2 In both cases, he points out,
having an environmental health background gives practitioners an
excellent start. The environmental health qualification is grounded
in public health and it teaches the practitioner to look at the
wider determinants of health. Policy tools like health impact assessments,
for instance, are not that far removed from environmental health
risk assessments.
Mr Wright cites the CIEH policy and development board's recent
decision to drop its call for the introduction of an approved code
of practice on passive smoking at work and campaign instead for
smoke-free workplaces (EHJ May 2003, page 138) as a significant
development and an excellent example of how the profession is working
to address the underlying causes of ill health.
He also refers to the Department of Health's Tackling health inequalities
- a programme for action, which was published last month, as an
important policy area where environmental health can influence decisions
and make significant improvements to public health.3 The programme,
which "sets out a three-year plan to carry forward the recommendations
in the 2002 cross-cutting spending review on health inequalities"
recognises that improving the health of the most deprived in society
has to be a priority if the widening gap in health inequalities
is to be reduced.
The document refers to key actions, which are likely to have the
greatest impact on the most vulnerable groups. These include improving
housing conditions and reducing fuel poverty; intervening to help
reduce smoking and improve nutrition; and action to reduce accidents
at home and on the road, all of which are traditional areas where
EHOs have the knowledge and expertise to make a difference.
As with PCTs, a growing body of environmental health practitioners
are lending their public health knowledge and skills to other influential
voices, most notably, the recently launched Health Protection Agency.
Sarah Webb, who is on secondment from her post as public health
specialist with East Lincolnshire PCT to the role of regional health
emergency planning adviser for the East Midlands at the HPA, says
her background in environmental health has proved invaluable in
her roles since leaving local government five years ago. "My
experience as an EHO gave me really useful problems solving skills,"
she says, "and an ability to look at health from an holistic
view point, for example by looking at the impact that the environment,
housing, transport and quality of life have on health."
After qualifying as an EHO in 1984, Ms Webb worked for a number
of local authorities specialising in housing and food safety before
moving into the NHS in 1998, when she joined Lincolnshire Health
Authority. At the time, she was one of only a handful of EHO appointments
in the country. A vital aspect of Ms Webb's remit, during her time
at the health authority, was the facilitation and liaison role with
environmental health departments across the county. This covered
a range of issues, including pollution, food poisoning outbreaks
and chemical contamination incidents. This closer co-operation has
directly helped strengthen the notification and surveillance of
infectious disease and has also resulted in an improvement in the
flow of information between district councils and the health authority.
Taking up her new post as public health specialist with East Lincolnshire
PCT, Ms Webb found herself working closely with its director of
public health, helping to build up "health profiles of the
local population as a form of needs assessment." It was a million
miles away from her work at local government. "If I am honest,
I found local government very narrow and restrictive," she
says, "and not a place in which I could develop professionally.
Working in public health in the NHS has brought me closer to my
environmental health roots in many ways than life as an EHO in local
government".
While her current role as an emergency planning adviser at the
HPA does not bring her into contact with the profession much, Ms
Webb believes that EHOs should seriously consider the HPA as a potential
employer. "I think EHOs have a broad base of skills and a pragmatic
approach that make them good candidates for the work the agency
does, ie protecting health," she says. "The agency is
very much in its infancy but it needs to build strong relationships
with local authorities and placements for part of the training period
for students, and secondments for more experienced EHOs would benefit
everyone."
Dr Naima Bradley, chemicals and environmental team leader at the
HPA East Midlands agrees. She says that EHOs have key strengths
that would benefit the HPA, including a sound working knowledge
of "what the local authority and what the health authority
does" as well as excellent people skills that come from working
closely with the community. This makes them perfect for co-ordinating
and advisory roles, she adds. In return, the HPA can provide EHOs
with an opportunity to put their public health skills to good use
by getting more involved in health-based projects.
Dr Bradley studied chemistry before retraining as an EHO in the
mid-1990s. This varied experience has enabled her to "combine
a hard science background as a chartered chemist with the people
skills of being EHO".
After working in an environmental protection unit in local government,
and acting as an environmental adviser to the non-ferrous metal
industrial sector, where she advised and represented industry at
national and European level, Dr Bradley joined the Public Health
Laboratory Service (PHLS) in July 2002, heading a team dealing with
the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) regime.
The PHLS was absorbed into the HPA on 1 April and part of her
work involves supporting PCTs in their role as statutory consultees
in the new regime. "For the first time, PCTs are able to comment
on the impact of the industry in their patch and be involved in
broader issues relating to environment, chemicals and health,"
she says.
As with other EHPs working in the emerging public health structures,
Dr Bradley has found that her environmental health skills have proved
invaluable. "The ability to address people at all level and
the ability to consider the broader issues when faced with a problem
have been extremely useful," she says.
Opportunities for experienced EHPs to further their careers in
public health have been enhanced with the launch of the Voluntary
Register for Specialists in Public Health.4 The Tripartite Group
(the Royal Institute of Public Health, the Faculty of Public Health
and the Multidisciplinary Public Health Forum) has been developing
national standards of specialist public health practice for three
years. With the register going live in May 2003, the facility is
now available for EHPs and other professions working in public health
practice to access the register.
The CIEH has been closely involved in the development of the portfolio
route to registration, which is only available for a period of three
years. "Top-up" training programmes are available to EHOs
regionally through the PCTs to make good small identified gaps in
their portfolios. The CIEH is also planning to run a workshop later
this year for members compiling a portfolio for assessment.
Through their holistic approach to public health, local authority
EHOs are well placed to promote health improvements and help reduce
health inequalities. However, as the drive towards joined-up thinking
and working accelerates, it is important that they take up the opportunities
that now exist to influence the very fabric of our society.