A new noise at work directive will require employers
to assess and measure noise levels within the framework of
risk assessment procedures. Tina Garrity reports
New limits for noise exposure at work will apply from February
2006, following the adoption of a new directive on noise at work.
The directive, which has taken 10 years to come to fruition, is
the 17th individual directive to be adopted under the 1989 health
and safety framework directive. It will replace the old 1986 noise
at work directive.
EMPLOYERS' DUTIES
The overall duties on employers are broadly the same as at present
but the details of some of the requirements are slightly different.
Employers will still have to assess and measure the levels of noise
to which their workers are exposed but will do so within the framework
of their risk assessment procedure. The directive requires that
the assessment and measurement be done by competent services at
suitable intervals and it lists the elements to which particular
attention must be paid. Any risks arising from exposure to noise
must be eliminated at source or reduced to a minimum and examples
of this are given. Where the risks cannot be prevented by other
means, appropriate, properly fitting individual hearing protectors
must be made available. These will have to be used by workers in
accordance with the directive on the minimum health and safety requirements
for use by workers of personal protective equipment at the workplace
(89/656/EEC).
Under no circumstances must the exposure of workers exceed the
exposure limit values set out in the directive (see below). Where
exposures above the limit values are detected, employers must take
immediate action to reduce them to below the limit values, identify
why the over exposure has occurred and amend the protection and
prevention measures in place to avoid any recurrence.
NOISE EXPOSURE VALUES
The directive sets out exposure limit values and exposure action
values in respect of the daily noise exposure levels and peak sound
pressure as follows:
exposure limit values: LEX,8h = 87 dB(A) and peak = 200 Pa
(1) respectively;
upper exposure action values: LEX,8h = 85 dB(A) and peak =
140 Pa (2) respectively; and
lower exposure action values: LEX,8h = 80 dB(A) and peak =
112 Pa (3) respectively.
The term "peak sound pressure" is defined as the "maximum
value of the 'C' - frequency weighted instantaneous noise pressure".
When applying the exposure limit values, the determination of the
worker's effective exposure must take account of the attenuation
provided by the individual hearing protectors worn by the worker.
This does not apply in the case of the exposure action values. In
duly justified circumstances, where the daily exposure levels varies
from one day to the next member states may use the weekly noise
exposure level instead but only under certain conditions. The directive
uses the following definitions for these:
daily noise exposure level (LEX,8h) (dB(A) re. 20 µPa):
time-weighted average of the noise exposure levels for a nominal
eight-hour working day as defined by international standard ISO
1999: 1990, point 3.6. It covers all noises present at work, including
impulsive noise; and
weekly noise exposure level (LEX,8h): time-weighted average
of the daily noise exposure levels for a nominal week of five
eight-hour working days as defined by international standard ISO
1999:1990, point 3.6 (note 2).
TRAINING AND HEALTH SURVEILLANCE
Where workers are exposed to noise levels at or above the lower
noise exposure action values, employers must provide information
and training to those workers and/or their representatives. The
elements to be covered are laid down in the directive. Where the
value is exceeded, they must make hearing protectors available.
Where exposure exceeds the upper action value employers must ensure
that hearing protectors are used.
Where the results of the exposure assessment indicate a risk to
workers' health, those workers must be given appropriate health
surveillance. A worker whose exposure exceeds the upper exposure
action value will have the right to have his or her hearing checked
by a doctor or by another suitably qualified person under the responsibility
of a doctor. Preventive audiometric testing must also be available
for workers whose exposure exceeds the lower exposure action values,
where the exposure assessment indicates a risk to health.
The objectives of these checks are to provide early diagnosis of
any loss of hearing due to noise, and to preserve the hearing function.
Where a worker is found to have identifiable hearing damage as
a result of exposure to noise at work the employer must review the
risk assessment and the measures provided to deal with the risks.
They must take into account the advice of the occupational healthcare
professional or other suitably qualified person or the competent
authority in implementing any measures required to eliminate or
reduce risk in accordance with the directive, including the possibility
of assigning the worker to alternative work where there is no risk
of further exposure. Additionally, they must arrange systematic
health surveillance and provide for a review of the health status
of any other worker who has been similarly exposed.
DEROGATIONS AND SPECIAL CASES
The directive recognises that in some circumstances the wearing
of hearing protectors can cause a greater risk to health and safety
than not wearing them. In such cases, member states are allowed
to derogate from the directive after consultation with both sides
of industry. Derogations, which must be reviewed every four years,
must be accompanied by guarantees that the resulting risks are reduced
to a minimum and that the workers concerned are subject to increased
health surveillance.
The directive also recognises the difficulties that the music
and entertainment sectors have in complying with rules on noise
at work. To this end it requires member states to draw up, in consultation
with the social partners, a code of conduct providing for practical
guidelines to help workers and employers in those sectors.
The establishment of a common European asylum system is one of
the long-term objectives of the European Union. Work towards this
began at a special European Council meeting at Tampere in Finland
in October 1999. One of the meeting's conclusions was that there
should be common minimum standards of reception for asylum seekers
entering the EU. These standards have now been agreed in the form
of a directive.
The directive covers areas such as the information to be given
to asylum seekers, their freedom of movement, their families, healthcare
provision, the education of their children etc. Among other things,
it requires member states to provide what it calls "material
reception conditions" for all asylum seekers when they make
their applications. These material reception conditions must ensure
"a standard of living adequate for the health of applicants
and capable of ensuring their subsistence". According to the
directive, any housing provided should take the form of one of the
following:
special premises used for that purpose; or
accommodation centres guaranteeing an adequate standard of
living; or
private houses, flats, hotels or other premises adapted for
housing applicants.
Transfers from one housing facility to another must only take place
where necessary. However, member states may adopt different material
reception conditions in some situations, eg where the conditions
specified are not available in a particular geographical area. Where
this happens, it must be for as short a period as possible and the
alternative conditions must still meet basic needs.
With regards to health care, the directive requires member states
to ensure that applicants receive the necessary health care, including,
at least, emergency care and essential treatment of illness. Those
with special needs must be given necessary medical or other assistance.
The medical screening of applicants on public health grounds is
permitted. Member states have until 6 February 2005 to implement
the directive.